Why We Built Signalmap — And Why 83% Accuracy Matters

We built Signalmap because exchange intelligence was broken. Here's the honest version of why that was true and what we've built to fix it.

The Problem We Saw

Exchange intelligence in 2024 was: CT alpha (incentive-misaligned), analyst reports (backward-looking), and news coverage (lagging). None of it gave you a reliable leading indicator of what exchanges were actually going to do next.

The Insight

Every exchange decision eventually requires headcount. Product launches need engineers. Regulatory expansions need compliance specialists. Institutional services need prime brokers. If you systematically track what exchanges are hiring for, you can systematically predict what they're about to announce.

Why 83% Matters

83% accuracy is not just a marketing number. It's a track record — 76 predictions, publicly logged, independently verifiable. Every miss is documented. Every prediction has a resolution date.

We publish our misses because accuracy claims without falsifiability are worthless. 83% only means something if you can verify the 17% that missed.

What We're Building Toward

We want to be the standard reference for exchange intelligence — the service that serious analysts, funds, and journalists consult before making exchange-related decisions. The hiring signal model is our foundation. The 400+ published intelligence posts are our educational layer. The 64 active predictions are the product.

Join us — 14-day money-back guarantee. €79/month until May 1. →